CASE 2: Political Dynasty in the Philippines
Political dynasties generally refer
to traditional political families or the practices by these political families
of monopolizing political power and public offices from generation to
generation and treating the public elective office almost as their personal
property. therefore, examines the general nature of the current Philippine
political dynasties the reasons for its continuing existence and its adverse
impact in the country.
In the Philippine elections
highlighted the dominance of political dynasties in the country. With all 80
provinces littered with political families, 74 percent of the elected members
of the House of Representatives came from such dynastic groups. Despite
overwhelming recognition that political dynasties breed patronage politics and
corruption, no substantial steps have been undertaken to address this issue.
This examines the general nature of
Philippine political dynasties, the reasons for their continuing existence and
their adverse impact on the country. This problem emanates basically from three
factors first is the political and socio-economic foundations upon which political
dynasties are built, Second is the inability to effectively implement
Philippine constitutional provisions by enacting an enabling land and lastly
the weakness of potential countervailing forces that would challenge political
dynasties.
Political families also lessen the
chance for new blood to enter politics, thus closing opportunities, and
stopping new ideas from entering the scene. As stated, corruption, and other
malicious deeds are easily being covered up due to abuse of power. With the
negative effects outbalancing the positive effects, it is only ideal for
political Dynasties to stop.
Political dynasties hard to topple,
despite the negative reactions of the popular towards political dynasties and
the association between dynasties activities and corruption. There has been a
lot of debate regarding the effect of political dynasties have on the political
and economic status of Philippines.
Political family has larger income
when compared to non-political family. They have more means of buying people’s
vote thus their retainment to office. These families also make use of the
population, especially the uneducated and the lower-class citizens to maintain
positions.
Dynasties also as a cultural
phenomenon. Historically not only that political dynasty in the country was
evident in the allegiance during pre-colonial period of a community to a datu a
title for a chief belonging to a royal family where political power was
inherited but it is also symptomatic of Filipino cultural values particularly
authoritarianism and particularism, which are exceptionally strong in a
collective society. Like any other cultural values, these are good or bad
depending upon how they are expressed and the people involved or affected.
Political dynasty is a well known
method of politicians in the Philippines wherein the members of the family been
made also a member of the government in order for them to not lose power but to
gain more power. This act abides an unfair and unjust because the government is
not a business that a family can run by themselves, but the government is for
all and other people should be given chances wherein they can be the one that
leads a community. The government or politics is not a business that can be run
by generation and generation of a family the government comprises a critical
part of a community having different leaders in every generation and not only
one leader that has his or her family in the position of the government
Comments
Post a Comment